Analisis Komparasi Elevasi DEMNAS dan ASTER GDEM Terhadap Hasil Survei Terestris

Authors

  • Soraya Irene Lumbantoruan Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia
  • Pintanugra Persadanta Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia
  • Willy Adrian Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54324/jtt.v2i2.28

Keywords:

airport feasibility study, topographic, elevation, accuracy

Abstract

The airport feasibility study is crucial for new airport proposals, serving as a prerequisite for determining the airport location. A key aspect of this study is assessing the construction's technical feasibility, particularly analyzing the topography of the proposed site. Topographic evaluation necessitates a terrestrial survey, known for its high precision as it's conducted directly on-site. However, this method is resource-intensive in terms of time, energy, and finances. Alternatively, DEMNAS and ASTER GDEM offer a cost-effective approach, providing comparable data with 8-meter and 30-meter spatial resolution, respectively. Analyzing their data against terrestrial surveys for a new airport site in Mahakam Ulu Regency, DEMNAS demonstrated an average elevation difference of 2.04 meters, whereas ASTER GDEM showed 8.89 meters. Validity and accuracy tests indicated that DEMNAS outperformed ASTER GDEM, showcasing a superior R2 value of 0.963 compared to 0.674, and lower RMSE of 2.417 meters versus 6.244 meters. The results suggest that DEMNAS, with its accuracy and efficiency, is a viable alternative for assessing the topographic conditions of potential airport sites, aiding in the preparation of comprehensive airport feasibility studies.

References

Afifi, A. Y., Fausan, A., & Sutoyo. (2022). Perbandingan Elevasi Lahan di Agrohills Berdasarkan GPS RTK dengan Data DEMNAS dan DEM ASTER. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, 7(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.29244/jsil.7.3.201-210

Akhmat, I. (2019). Analisis Kemiringan Lereng Berdasarkan Hasil Drone serta DEM ASTER di Dusun Ngantru, Kabupaten Bojonegoro, Jawa Timur.

Badan Informasi Geospasial. (2012). Keputusan Deputi Bidang Informasi Geospasial Tematik Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Standard Operating Procedures di Lingkungan Pusat Pemetaan dan Integrasi Tematik.

Badan Informasi Geospasial. (2014). Peraturan Kepala Badan Informasi Geospasial Nomor 15 Tahun 2014.

Badan Informasi Geospasial. (2018). DEMNAS. https://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/demnas/#/

Band, S. S., Janizadeh, S., Pal, S. C., Chowdhuri, I., Siabi, Z., Norouzi, A., Melesse, A. M., Shokri, M., & Mosavi, A. (2020). Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence models for accurate estimation of groundwater nitrate concentration. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(20), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205763

Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Aproach to Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research.

Daniel, A., & Sulistian, T. (2019). Analisis Akurasi Vertikal Digital Elevation Model Nasional (DEMNAS) Studi Kasus Kota Medan. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338935900

Dolloff, J., & Carr, J. (2016). Computation of scalar accuracy metrics LE, CE, and SE as both predictive and sample-based statistics.

Ghozali, Dr. H. I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 19: Vol. Edisi 5. Universitas Diponegoro.

Hernanda, A., Azwar, Putri, Y. E., & Sipil, T. (2022). Analisis Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Menggunakan Arcgis 10.4.1 pada Kawasan Baturaja Permai. 1(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.4.1

Kementerian Perhubungan. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Tata Cara dan Prosedur Penetapan Lokasi Bandar Udara.

Kementerian Perhubungan. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 164 Tahun 2022 tentang Penetapan Lokasi Bandar Udara di Ujoh Bilang Kabupaten Mahakam Ulu Provinsi Kalimantan Timur.

Marindah, O., Iswari, Y., & Anggraini, K. (2018). DEMNAS : Model Digital Ketinggian Nasional untuk Aplikasi Kepesisiran. XLIII, 68. https://earthexplorer.

Motovilov, Y. G., Gottschalk, L., Engeland, K., & Rodhe, A. (1999). Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 98–99, 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00102-1

NASA. (2019). New Version of the ASTER GDEM.

Schumann, G. J.-P., & Bates, P. D. (2018). The Need for a High-Accuracy, Open-Access Global DEM. Frontiers in Earth Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00225

Usud, A., & Sukojo, B. M. (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Tutupan Lahan terhadap Ketelitian ASTER GDEM V2 dan DEM SRTM V4.1 (Studi Kasus: Kota Batu, Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur).

Yao, J., Chao-lu, Y., & Ping, F. (2020). Evaluation of the Accuracy of SRTM3 and ASTER GDEM in the Tibetan Plateau Mountain Ranges. E3S Web of Conferences, 206, 01027. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020601027

Downloads

Published

2023-11-02

How to Cite

Lumbantoruan, S. I., Persadanta, P., & Adrian, W. (2023). Analisis Komparasi Elevasi DEMNAS dan ASTER GDEM Terhadap Hasil Survei Terestris . Jurnal Teknik Transportasi, 2(2), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.54324/jtt.v2i2.28

Issue

Section

Articles